When we started building CARL, we knew a good lesson structure wasn’t enough.
You can have perfectly sequenced activities and still lose half the class by minute five. Structure alone doesn’t create a classroom where every student can actually learn.
So we built something most AI lesson tools don’t do reliably: Lesson Enhancements. They’re supports for the things teachers care about most but that get cut first when planning happens late at night.
The Six Areas
Every CARL lesson surfaces prompts and suggestions across six areas:
- UDL and Differentiation: How do we remove barriers and give multiple ways into the learning?
- Equity and Inclusion: Whose voices are centred? Whose experiences are acknowledged?
- Indigenous Resource Pathways: How do we point students toward authentic Indigenous perspectives, not generic add-ons?
- Social Emotional Learning: What emotional or relational support might this activity need?
- Student Voice and Choice: Where can students make real decisions?
- Trauma-Informed Safeguards: How do we build in safety, predictability, and opt-out paths?
These aren’t checklists. They’re activity-specific and phase-aware, written in plain language you can drop straight into instruction. And they’re options, not requirements.
Why They’re Split in Two
One design choice that isn’t obvious from the outside: CARL separates enhancements into Teaching Enhancements and Learning Enhancements.
Teaching Enhancements show up when you’re instructing, modeling, or guiding practice. They’re for you. Learning Enhancements show up during independent or group work. They’re built into what students do.
Teachers told us they need different kinds of support at different moments, so the same category can appear twice with a different job. In a Grade 6 lesson on government systems, an SEL Teaching Enhancement might model “expert group anxiety” out loud before the I Do. Later, an SEL Learning Enhancement might drop a quick check into group work: “On a scale of 1 to 5, how well are you and your partner sharing decisions?”
Same category. Different function. Different timing.
Why Specificity Is the Whole Point
Most AI tools offer supports that sound fine and help no one:
“Provide differentiation for diverse learners. Use sentence frames.”
Technically correct. Practically useless.
Here’s what CARL generates instead, from a Grade 12 climate science lesson:
- Visual barrier: Feedback loop flowcharts with pre-cut arrows and labels, so students physically map energy transfer on the board
- Motor barrier: Digital whiteboard or physical chart paper, student picks the medium
- Processing barrier: A word bank with terms like “permafrost” and “thermal energy” to cut cognitive load while labeling
That’s not a reminder to differentiate. That’s exactly how to adapt the activity. That specificity is the difference between a support you’ll actually use and one you’ll scroll past.
Indigenous Resource Pathways
This one we’re careful with. CARL never generates Indigenous content or interprets Indigenous knowledge. It points teachers to Indigenous-authored and Nation-shared resources, and lets students learn from those voices directly.
In a Grade 10 English lesson on story structure, instead of treating Campbell’s hero’s journey as universal, CARL suggests exploring how storytelling differs across cultures and pointing students to Indigenous authors:
- The Back of the Turtle by Thomas King (Anishinaabe)
- Monkey Beach by Eden Robinson (Haisla/Heiltsuk)
- CBC’s Unreserved episodes on storytelling traditions
- Your local First Nation’s website or cultural centre
That’s not “acknowledge Indigenous perspectives.” It’s pointing students straight to Indigenous voices and letting them draw their own conclusions.
Options, Not Mandates
These reflect what I studied during my MEd in AI and Equitable Education, and a year of research with teachers in real classrooms. UDL, equity, trauma-informed practice, and student voice aren’t nice-to-haves. They’re what make a classroom work for everyone.
But caring about them and having the capacity to plan for all of them at 10pm are two different things. So CARL surfaces them automatically, then gets out of the way.
You might use all six in a lesson. You might use two. You might read them and decide today isn’t the day. That choice is always yours.
The Bottom Line
These supports are what make CARL feel different. They’re not tacked on. They’re activity-specific, phase-aware, and written so you can use them right away.
Because good teaching isn’t just getting through the content. It’s building a room where every student can thrive. That’s what the enhancements are for.

